Friday July26, 2024 review by Kathryn Hughes
We are so used to the idea of Henry VIII being
vile to his wives that it's easy to overlook the fact that he was
equally beastly to his sister.
Margaret Tudor was born two years before Henry
and he never seems to have forgiven her for arriving first. Add in the
fact that she became Queen of Scotland at the age of 13 when he was
still only Prince of Wales and you have the makings of a sibling
rivalry that stretched until her death in 1541.
This might be funny were it not for the fact
that instead of squabbing over who was better at Latin or had the
nicest pony, the royal brother and sister indulged in vicious
politicking which descended into their respective kingdoms taking up
arms against each other.
Henry outlived his sister by just over five
years, but it was long enough to enough to ensure that he won the PR
war. As a result, Margaret Tudor has gone down in the historical
records as a silly woman who spent her time buying clothes she
couldn't afford and sleeping with unsuitable men.
Nastiest of all, Henry accused his sister of
writing him begging letters and whingeing about being short of money.
What he didn’t mention was that he had deliberately withheld from her
the fortune that she had inherited under the terms of their father's
will. In the circumstances, she had every right to complain.
In this passionate act of rehabilitation,
Linda Porter argues that Margaret Tudor was a lot more than an airhead
who didn't know where to stop with the diamonds.
From the moment she arrived north, barely into
her teens, to marry James W of Scotland, she developed a subtle but
powerful sense of what needed to be done to prevent Scotland from
fracturing into warring clans. You have only to know that the people
around her were called things such as Archibald the Grim, James the
Gross and Robert Blackadder to realise that this was a wild and
wuthering place.
Indeed, the names are a particularly terrific
aspect of this entertaining book. 'Hugh the Dull' sounds like the kind
of person to avoid at parties, although Margaret's personal messenger,
'Jammy Dogge', was probably a delight.
The one saving grace in Margaret's new life
north of the border was her husband, King James. While the fact that
he was 30 to her 13 rings modern alarm bells, in fact he seems to have
been a genuinely loving and attentive husband.
He also appreciated the subtle power that came
with dressing well, and he showered his young wife with expensive
furs, silks and jewels so that she looked as fancy as any French
princess (Scotland and France were historically bound together in the
Auld Alliance' which,
Even more significant, from a tactical point
of view, was that Margaret produced a string of babies in the first
years of her marriage, ensuring the Stuart dynasty's security for the
next generation and beyond. One of her grandchildren became Mary Queen
of Scots.
It was his sister's fertility that made Henry
especially furious. Despite having been married to Katherine of Aragon
for seven years, he was still childless, which meant that, should
anything happen to him, Margaret would inherit the English throne,
quite possibly with James ruling alongside her. For such a competitive
man, the thought was unbearable.
This simmering bad feeling came to a head in
1513 at the Battle of Flodden between the English and Scots, which led
to the bloody death of James and most of his nobles. For the rest of her life Margaret found herself in
a tenuous position. Her baby son was now crowned James V and she was
installed as his Regent. But this arrangement was never going to
impress ruthless Scottish clansmen, who now competed to see who could
dethrone her.
At this point Henry could have stepped in to
help his sister. Instead he took perverse pleasure in making things
tricky.
When she announced her intention to divorce
her next husband, a rotter called Archibald Douglas who had siphoned
off what remained of her money, Henry delivered a condescending
lecture on her low nmoral standards. This was particularly rich given
the way that he was going through wives like a hot knife through
butter.
Ironically, in the long term it was Margaret
who won this deadly sibling feud. Despite his multiple marriages,
Henry failed to establish a secure Tudor bloodline – none of
his children produced an heir.
Margaret's great-grandson, by contrast, ruled
Scotland as James VI and in 1603, on Queen Elizabeth I’s death, was
invited south to become James I of England.
Within a year he decreed that would be known
as the King of Great Britain. From now on Scotland and
England would walk together, despite many subsequent attempts
to divide them.
Linda Porter has drawn on the latest
scholarship to light up a shadowy and fascinating corner of Tudor
history.
HISTORY
THE THISTLE AND THE ROSE
By Linda Porter
(Head of Zeus £27.99, 400 pp)