Charles II, one of our most popular kings, was 
		  a fascinating but deeply flawed and unreliable ruler, heading what was 
		  seen in his own lifetime as a dissolute and immoral court. Charming as 
		  Charles undoubtedly was, the enduring sobriquet coined for him by Lord 
		  Rochester, 'the Merry Monarch', was hardly accurate, although 
		  elsewhere in his A Satyr on Charles II he stated more precisely that 
		  'Restless he rolls from whore to whore'. The women Rochester was 
		  referring to, along with a non-mistress and a queen, are the seven 
		  subjects of Linda Porter's Mistresses.
While two of Charles 
		  Il's mistresses, Barbara Villiers and Louise de Kéroulle, were of 
		  aristocratic background and successively occupied the powerful, 
		  semi-official position of 
		  maîtresse-en-titre for the entirety 
		  of his reign, others were actresses or from the gentry Porter's three 
		  chapters on the combative and largely forgotten Lucy Walter, who 
		  became Charles's mistress during his exile when they were both 
		  eighteen, gives an unbiased portrayal of what she describes as a 
		  'brittle and sad life'. But it was Barbara and Louise, created 
		  duchesses of Cleveland and Portsmouth respectively, who were the most 
		  important of the king's mistresses. Their functions at court went far 
		  beyond merely satisfying the sexual demands of the monarch. Porter 
		  explains in lively detail their political activities and their roles 
		  in offering access to the king, as well as their patronage and their 
		  accumulation of personal wealth.
Barbara was already 
		  the king's mistress at the time of the Restoration in 1660. Porter 
		  describes how she understood the importance of being visible at court 
		  to maintain her role, something that didn't cease when the king 
		  married Catherine of Braganza two years later. Porter captures the 
		  avaricious and cruel elements of both the king's and Barbara's 
		  personalities as she describes their treatment of the Portuguese-born 
		  queen, with Charles installing his mistress as one of  his wife's 
		  ladies of the bedchamber and having her constantly in the queen's 
		  presence. Porter questions the idea that Catherine became friendly 
		  with Barbara to appease her husband, suggesting that she instead put 
		  up with her under sufferance. Barbara would humiliate the queen in 
		  other ways too. In one of the many portraits of Barbara produced by 
		  Peter Lely, the king's principal painter, she appears as the Madonna, 
		  holding up one of her bastard sons by the king as the infant Christ, 
		  while apparently pregnant with Charles's next child. Porter notes the 
		  `hint of triumphalism' in the picture.
Porter provides a realistic depiction of 
		  Catherine, Charles's misunderstood consort, which goes beyond reducing 
		  her to the gendered stereotype of the long-suffering wife. While 
		  Charles refused to divorce her, not just in response to the upswell of 
		  anti-Catholic feeling during the Popish Plot but also because he 
		  wanted to secure a legitimate heir, she held a superior position to 
		  the king's mistresses, who occupied servile roles. In Porter's view, 
		  Catherine created her own distinctive identity with `considerable 
		  aplomb', decorating her apartments with Indian calicoes and employing 
		  fashionable Italian musicians and Catholic artists. She also hints at 
		  the queen's involvement in Charles's deathbed conversion to 
		  Catholicism.
Porter presents an 
		  interesting depiction of Frances Stuart, Duchess of Richmond, the 
		  woman who refused to be bedded by the king, despite his obsession with 
		  her, reflecting on her astute business mind and instinct for survival. 
		  The 'baby-faced Bretonne', Louise de Kéroualle, held the role of 
		  king's mistress for the longest time, from 1670 until Charles's death 
		  in 1685. Louise's French nationality, her Catholicism, the suspicion 
		  that she was spying for Louis )(IV and the vast amount of money she 
		  obtained from the king (Porter calculates she was latterly receiving 
		  the equivalent today of ‘59 million annually) made her Charles's most 
		  unpopular mistress.
Louise's antithesis, the best-known of Charles 
		  mistresses, was the actress Nell Gwyn. Although she was highly visible 
		  at court and her two sons by the king were ennobled, Nell played up 
		  her lowliness (she was raised in a brothel and may have been a child 
		  prostitute) and seemed to enjoy cultivating a patriotic persona. She 
		  famously settled a mob that had begun attacking her carriage thinking 
		  Louise was inside by shouting, 'Pray good people be civil, I am the 
		  Protestant whore!' Porter says that Nell's 'cheerful vulgarity' added 
		  to her popularity (she once laced the food of fellow actress-mistress 
		  Moll Davis with laxatives before an arranged evening with the king). 
		  She also correctly states, in contradiction of two well-known lines on 
		  her relationship with Charles (`She hath got a trick to handle his 
		  prick/But never lays hands on his sceptre'), that the claim Nell 
		  wasn't interested in politics is untrue and discusses, for example, 
		  her open support of the Protestant Duke of Monmouth during the 
		  Exclusion Crisis.
The last of Charles's mistresses was Hortense 
		  Mancini, Duchesse de Mazarin (a love from his period of exile, to whom 
		  he had proposed in 1659), who came to England in 1675 as part of a 
		  plot to replace Louise. Porter highlights Hortense's eccentricities, 
		  such as her nocturnal fencing in St James's Park, dressed in a 
		  nightdress, with the king's eldest daughter (with whom she may have 
		  had a sexual relationship). Although a mistress for only around a 
		  year, Hortense remained at court; less than a fortnight before the 
		  king's death, the diarist John Evelyn was appalled to see, alongside a 
		  group of courtiers gambling and a 'French boy singing love songs', the 
		  king 'toying with his concubines, Portsmouth, Cleveland and Mazarin'.
While we might not necessarily learn anything 
		  new here about the lives of these women, Porter's engaging and 
		  well-researched book convincingly presents them as adding to both the 
		  glory of the king's reign and its failings. Evelyn thought Charles 
		  would have been 'an excellent prince ... had he been less addicted to 
		  women’. One of the book's strengths is Porter's uncompromisingly 
		  impartial treatment of the king while discussing the lives of the key 
		  women in his life.
		  By Linda Porter